Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)

Started by Computer Hope Admin, March 03, 2009, 01:47:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BC_Programmer

Quote from: harry 48 on August 05, 2010, 03:24:18 PM
this win7  is hard to learn , i'm having to write these results down until i get screen capture up and running

???

It's still PrintScreen or Alt+Printscreen (for just the active window), just as it's been since windows 3.1...
I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

SilentAssasin64

Any comparable benchmark tools for us Linux users?
Back In The Game

Computer Hope Admin

Quote from: SilentAssasin64 on September 10, 2010, 09:17:16 PM
Any comparable benchmark tools for us Linux users?

That's a great question and sorry forgetting the Linux crowd. I hope to see more Linux related questions so I can amp up the Linux support on Computer Hope. I mainly focus on Windows since that's what most users have. I welcome any other Linux benchmark suggestions, but from what I've read HardInfo and Phoronix are the best.

http://hardinfo.berlios.de/HomePage
http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/
Everybody is a genius. But, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.
-Albert Einstein

SilentAssasin64

I'll give those a shot.  In CrystalMark2004, I hit around 157,000.  This was while having a few torrents, flash videos, and applications running, though.  Will give these all a test later on an idle system.
Back In The Game

Ryder17z

I'm running Firefox (+100 tabs), Winamp and a torrent client, so I dont know if these results are good/bad

CrystalMark: 117005

AMD Athlon II 250 3.0GHz
ATI 5670 1GB
4GB Ram
WinXP 32Bit
1280x1024 & 1024x768 32Bit
The cake is a lie...

quaxo

Was curious how my latest build would do. (specs in profile)

Quote-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CrystalMark 2004R3 [0.9.126.452] (C) 2001-2008 hiyohiyo
                                  Crystal Dew World [http://crystalmark.info/]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalMark Result
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    CrystalMark :  198841

[ ALU ]             51854
[ FPU ]             52200
[ MEM ]             34016
[ HDD ]             10195
[ GDI ]              9951
[ D2D ]              4871
[ OGL ]             35754


BisquitMaker

What benchmarks are used for SPARC64 and PowerPC systems running FreeBSD and OpenBSD?

Biker


Ankylosaurus


CrystalMark 2004 Score 29.9.11 by pinzac55, on Flickr

This is my score with my current setup, core components being -
ASUS Maximus IV Extreme Z mobo
Intel i7 2600K CPU
XFX Radeon 6950 2GB GPU
8GB (2 x 4) G.Skill Ripjaws X 2133 Mhz RAM
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD "C" Drive
WD Caviar Black 1TB HDD "D" Drive

All parts are at their factory setting, not overclocked and the GPU not unlocked (yet).

Here's a rather amateurish video of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ9xcFcezAU&feature=channel_video_title please thumbs up if you like!
"Knowledge is cheap at any price"


10twenty

I got 204156. with load of apps running- I ran the benchmark on a whim.
I would probably see better marks if I didn't have anything running. certain programs such as Dropbox (for work) uses CPU/disk all the time. Bittorrent uses disk & network. Got VLC Media player running (watching Naruto), then there's Chrome, steam, log me in, and finally Vista's wasteful system resources hog. suppose if I took the effort and inconvenience to turn everything off, I'd probably get better scores.


Full size: http://i.imgur.com/hOyW1.png

Image shows all system specs as well as programs running in background @ time of test.
Computer name blocked out to protect my personal info.
Also system temps- either this benchmark isn't very heavy on resources or I've got excellent cooling that can handle all loads. when I first built this PC there were some temps concerns- at full load in stress tests CPU temps would hit 75C and IOH would top 90C. temps are much lower now... although I've yet to do a 100% load stress test.

Did I mention this is a silent/ultra low noise system? Its so quiet if it wasn't for one fan LED (I disabled the others since they're stupid) I'd probably forget it's even running...


kyle_engineer

What's the most standardized for win7 ult 64?

And when I post my results, expect them to be photoshopped! LOL! Jk
"Any answer is only as good as it satisfies the question." - Me

0000000100101011000 -
010010010010000001001100010011110100110001000000010110010100111101010101

camerongray

Although this is an old thread, I thought I may as well update it with the results for my current PC.  Was thinking that it may also be a good idea to create a new thread like this with a newer benchmarking utility as I'm not sure how much CrystalMark2004 will take advantage of modern hardware.

Also note that although Speccy shows the CPU clock as being 3.5GHz, I actually have it overclocked to 4.3GHz with Turbo Boost up to 5.25GHz.