Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)

Started by Computer Hope Admin, March 03, 2009, 01:47:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


paudashlake

No doubt in my mind.....................  it is!

I have a 2.3, you have a 2.5!  See the difference?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

And my gpu is horrific!
Hinkle Finkle Dinkle Doo.  AMEN!! 


computeruler


paudashlake

Hinkle Finkle Dinkle Doo.  AMEN!! 


CaptainStickMan



hmm... maybe i should overclock...

and PS - AMD is NOT better...

Calum

Captain - could you post your specs, or even better, edit them into your profile, so we can see what hardware you have?

CaptainStickMan

XClio A380 Full tower ATX case (Black)
Enermax Galaxy EGA1000EWL 1000W ATX (80 plus) PSU
Intel DX58SO LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX motherboard
Intel Core i7 940 Nehalem 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
6GB (3x2GB) G.Skill 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM (PC3 10666)
ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1GB 512-bit GDDR3
4x Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA2 (all 4 drives in RAID 0 array)
Sony Blu-ray Burner BWU-100A
Samsung 22x SATA DVD burner SH-s223F
Hanns•G HG-281DPB Black 27.5" 3ms Widescreen LCD HDMI Monitor
Microsoft M54-00013 Blue Bluetooth keyboard
Logitech G5 Laser mouse
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate x64


<3 newegg.com

computeruler

I <3 newegg too!  Very nice system you got there.  Makes me feel old and outdated and I want a new one.  Also, wouldnt it be about the same price to just gt a 2tb hard drive?

CaptainStickMan

probably right, but the transfer speeds are much faster with 4 drives on RAID 0. Also, I originally built my system two years ago, and have since replaced all but the keyboard, mouse, case, and... Hard drives  :P  There might have possibly been 1TB drives available at that time, but if so were very pricey. 320s were the most bang for the buck at the time. Been serving me well or they would have gone the way of the EVGA motherboard that I quickly came to loathe which now sits collecting dust in the closet lol.

lectrocrew

Quote from: patio on March 07, 2009, 05:40:52 PM
No 64Bit ? ?     :'(

I could run a few individual tests but no results page.
Me too.  :(

CaptainStickMan



CaptainStickMan



This is with a slight overclock of the Host Clock Frequency, about 10 Mhz I believe.  The results seem a little strange, mostly I guess the fact that the HDD score was down. Possibly related to major fragmenting from backing up and deleting files from computers that I have been working on...  anyway, I'm sure this hardware is capable of much more, but I don't feel like risking blowing is all up, so that's good enough  ::)

Computer Hope Admin

Yeah definately not worth damaging the hardware, you're getting great results with what you're already doing.
Everybody is a genius. But, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.
-Albert Einstein

patio

Bad DLoad...got it to run on VistaX64 and Win7X64...

QuoteCrystalMark :  161832
" Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "